Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Letters to the Editor

Only Thinskins offended by ‘Redskins’

The May 26th letter by Carl Morello (“The ‘Washington’ name offends me”) pointed to a survey showing nine out of 10 Native Americans have no issue with “Redskins” and that he finds Washington, D.C., (the government there) to be more offensive.

For years, I was the only Caucasian working with a number of Hispanics. They called me “guero” (white) and the African Americans around us “negro” (black), and no offense was taken. That’s just what we are, color-wise. When Europeans first saw Native Americans, they noted that their skin was reddish-copper and referred to them as “Redskins,” color-wise. That’s what people do, they differentiate, like how non-Caucasians now refer to themselves as “people of color.”

I was born in D.C. I am part Indian. The Redskins are my team. Like Mr. Morello, the only offense I take is with the politicians who kowtow to vocal minorities who delight in creating issues where none exist.

I was taught that “sticks and stones might break my bones, but words can never hurt me.” I guess those who are offended for being called what they are, are “Thinskins.”

William Hill, Fresno

This story was originally published May 30, 2016 at 6:45 PM with the headline "Only Thinskins offended by ‘Redskins’."

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER