The Central Valley needs a strong leader in Congress. Here’s our recommendation | Opinion
California’s 20th congressional district is not an easy place to represent. It is vast, rural and deeply tied to agriculture, energy and water – the kinds of issues that require more than talking points.
They require fluency. They require seriousness. They require someone who recognizes how policy decisions ripple through farms, fields and families.
That is why the Republican incumbent, Rep. Vince Fong, earns our endorsement.
Fong, 46, is the most prepared and most knowledgeable candidate in this race. Once a staffer to former Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas, he brings a level of policy depth that was evident throughout our interview. On water, on energy, on infrastructure, his answers were detailed, nuanced and rooted in the realities of the Central Valley in a way his challengers could not match.
That level of understanding matters in a district where water policy alone can determine whether communities survive or shrink.
Fong can also point to tangible accomplishments. He highlighted more than $500 million secured for water infrastructure – investments in storage, conveyance and recharge that are critical in a region living through increasing hydrologic uncertainty. He grasps that California’s water system only works when it is treated as a system, not a series of disconnected political fights.
But this endorsement comes with a clear expectation. Fong must more consistently use that expertise to advocate for his district, especially when federal policy is hurting the very people he represents.
On trade, Fong offered a sophisticated defense of tariffs as a negotiating tool to counter foreign subsidies and market restrictions abroad. There’s some truth in that argument. Global markets are not always fair, and U.S. growers do face real barriers.
But in the Central Valley, the results are what matter, and the results are not working.
California agriculture, including top-producing pistachio growers in Fong’s district, has taken a direct hit from retaliatory tariffs and trade tensions. China was not just a large market. It was a high-value one. When access collapsed, growers didn’t just lose volume. They lost premium pricing and relationships they worked hard to build. Replacement markets in Europe and India simply don’t offer the same return.
This is not an abstract policy debate. It is lost income, lost stability and growing uncertainty across this district.
Fong knows trade policy. That is precisely why more is required of him. If tariffs are part of the strategy, then so must be a strategy to protect the growers caught in the crossfire. Right now, too many are worse off than they were before, and they need a stronger advocate in Washington.
More broadly, Fong would benefit from embracing the pragmatic tradition of California Republicans, the kind that prioritizes the needs of the district when they diverge from national political priorities. That includes listening more closely on issues like immigration, where the region’s agricultural economy depends on a stable workforce, and on economic mobility where rural communities continue to struggle.
It also means reckoning with the local impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill – legislation that Fong supported – which is already reshaping county budgets across his district and the state. Fresno County, as a result, is bracing for a total loss of $69 million to $295 million in federal funding, raising the risk of downstream effects that could touch everything from housing stability to public safety.
Fong’s challengers, Democrat Sandra Van Scotter and independent Ben Dewell, bring sincerity and life experience, but neither demonstrated the readiness nor the policy command required for Congress. In a district this complex, that gap matters.
Fong has the intellect, the experience and the platform to be an effective representative .Now he must more consistently use them in service of the people and industries that depend on him.
Voters should send Vince Fong back to Congress – and insist he fight harder for the people who put him there.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat are editorials, and who writes them?
Editorials represent the collective views of the editorial boards of McClatchy Media’s California opinion teams.
They do not reflect the individual opinions of board members or the views of reporters in the news sections of The Sacramento Bee and its sister publication, the San Luis Obispo Tribune. Reporters do not participate in editorial board deliberations or weigh in on board decisions.
In Sacramento, the board includes Executive Editor Chris Fusco, California Opinion Editor Marcos Breton, opinion writers Robin Epley, Tom Philp, LeBron Antonio Hill, Cathie Anderson and op-ed editor Hannah Holzer.
In San Luis Obispo, it includes Opinion Editor Stephanie Finucane.
We base our opinions on reporting by our colleagues in the news section, and our own reporting and interviews. Our members attend public meetings, call people and follow-up on story ideas from readers just as news reporters do.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
Tell us what you think
You may or may not agree with our perspective. We believe disagreement is healthy and necessary for a functioning democracy. If you would like to share your own views on events important to California, you may write a letter to the editor (150 words or less) using this form, or email an op-ed (650-750 words) to opinion@sacbee.com. Due to a high volume of submissions, we are not able to publish everything we receive.