Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Fresno-area women don’t need to panic about abortion access. California has your back

Demonstrators protest outside of the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday, May 3, in Washington. A draft opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday. Whatever the outcome, the Politico report represents an extremely rare breach of the court’s secretive deliberation process, and on a case of surpassing importance.
Demonstrators protest outside of the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday, May 3, in Washington. A draft opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court could be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a Politico report released Monday. Whatever the outcome, the Politico report represents an extremely rare breach of the court’s secretive deliberation process, and on a case of surpassing importance. AP

Fresno-area women don’t need to panic about the U.S. Supreme Court’s possible ruling to overturn Roe vs. Wade, the landmark 1973 abortion-rights decision.

If the justices do as expected in several months and scrap Roe vs. Wade, the right to choose to get an abortion will be left to states. And California’s Democratic leaders have made it clear that a woman’s right to choose will remain sacrosanct in the Golden State.

“California will not sit back. We are going to fight like hell,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday night in a posting to Twitter.

The news site Politico broke the story about a leaked draft decision it obtained that was written by conservative Justice Samuel A. Alito. The Washington Post, summarizing the report, said Alito, along with Justice Clarence Thomas and all three of President Donald Trump’s nominees to the court — Justices Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — voted to overturn the precedent.

In reaction, The New York Times reported that late Monday evening Newsom and the two Democratic leaders in the Legislature — Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon and Toni Atkins, president pro tempore of the state Senate, would propose an amendment to the state Constitution to protect abortion access. Such a measure could come before voters as soon as November.

It would seem such a measure is not needed. The California Constitution already protects abortion rights as a right to privacy. Atkins told The Times the lawmakers “want to be very clear that the right to abortion is what we’re talking about.”

The only way the federal government could ban abortion nationwide is by Congress passing such a law and the president signing it. Even then, states like California would sue to stop such a prohibition from taking effect.

The West Coast overall is a bulwark for abortion rights. Oregon, Washington and Nevada also have laws protecting the right to end an unwanted pregnancy.

Whether the high court follows through on Alito’s decision has yet to become official, though it seems all but certain.

Women in Fresno and the greater San Joaquin Valley can take heart, however, that in their corner of America, they will keep the right to make their own decisions about their pregnancies.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What are editorials, and who writes them?

Editorials represent the collective opinion of the The Fresno Bee Editorial Board. They do not reflect the individual opinions of board members, or the views of Bee reporters in the news section. Bee reporters do not participate in editorial board deliberations or weigh in on board decisions.

The board includes Opinion Editor Juan Esparza Loera, opinion writer Tad Weber, McClatchy California Opinion Editor Marcos Bretón and Hannah Holzer, McClatchy California Opinion op-ed editor.

We base our opinions on reporting by our colleagues in the news section, and our own reporting and interviews. Our members attend public meetings, call sources and follow-up on story ideas from readers just as news reporters do. Unlike reporters, who are objective, we share our judgments and state clearly what we think should happen based on our knowledge.

Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

Tell us what you think

You may or may not agree with our perspective. We believe disagreement is healthy and necessary for a functioning democracy. If you would like to share your own views on events important to the Fresno region, you may write a letter to the editor (220 words or less) or email an op-ed (600 words). Either can be sent to letters@fresnobee.com. Due to a high volume of submissions, we are not able to publish everything we receive.

This story was originally published May 3, 2022 at 7:52 AM.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER