Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

California would be a casualty of Trump’s trade war

Canadian finance minister Bill Morneau, framed by structural steel, said Monday in Toronto that Canada should be exempted from steel tariffs President Donald Trump is weighing.
Canadian finance minister Bill Morneau, framed by structural steel, said Monday in Toronto that Canada should be exempted from steel tariffs President Donald Trump is weighing. The Canadian Press via AP

Chaos in the Trump White House doesn’t usually directly affect Californians’ daily lives. But if President Donald Trump’s decision Thursday to impose tariffs on imported steel and aluminum lead to a trade war, it will cost jobs, raise prices and set back California’s economy.

Exports – which totaled $172 billion in 2017, 11 percent of the U.S. total – are a big part of our economy. So it was bad enough for Trump to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and to threaten the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Now, he’s about to take his terrible trade policy to an even more dangerous place.

Trump’s decision to levy a 25 percent tariff on steel imports and a 10 percent duty on aluminum, will mean job losses. While there are only about 5,500 steel workers in California, there are more than 100,000 workers in industries that use steel and would face higher costs.

The tariffs would also mean higher prices for consumers. When the 28-nation European Union said it would retaliate against U.S. products, Trump threatened to increase tariffs on European cars. That’s the thing with trade wars – they can escalate quickly and easily spin out of control. The entire global economy can be disrupted.

California’s business and political leaders must speak out clearly and loudly against these tariffs. On Tuesday, the California Chamber issued a statement urging Trump against imposing the tariffs, which it called a “misguided and dangerous policy” that is “likely to cause a trade war.”

While Trump is apparently aiming at China with these tariffs, he badly misfired. More steel imports come from our allies – Canada, Japan and South Korea. While his trade adviser said there would be no exemptions, Canada and Mexico were granted temporary exemptions while Trump seeks to use the tariffs as leverage in the negotiations to revise the North American Free Trade Agreement. Canada and Mexico are California’s two largest export markets.

The tariffs are supported by steel and aluminum companies that would be protected from foreign competition, some Rust Belt Democrats and some unions.

But far more businesses – automakers and beer brewers alike – have warned about job losses and price increases. So have fellow Republicans, including House Speaker Paul Ryan, who urged a “more surgical approach” to avert a trade war. Trump’s top economic adviser, Gary Cohn, reportedly opposed the tariffs and announced his resignation Tuesday.

Stock markets around the world are spooked. As experts point out, trade is not a zero-sum game. Lowering barriers increases economic activity and, on balance, helps more nations.

Despite the criticism and the facts, Trump didn’t back down and imposed the tariffs.

On Friday, he tweeted that “trade wars are good and easy to win” – one of his most ridiculous tweets ever, which is saying a lot.

On Tuesday, he said the tariffs would be applied in a “loving way,” whatever that means.

Trump says he wants to bring the steel and aluminum industries back from the dead. But particularly with this president, these tariffs aren’t going to necessarily save or create jobs. Why would any corporation invest a sizable amount of money in a new plant if Trump could see a segment on “Fox & Friends” and suddenly change his mind?

Trump’s advisers need to teach him the lesson of another Republican president, George W. Bush, who also imposed tariffs on steel, but backed off a year later, after the loss of as many as 200,000 jobs. Unfortunately, Trump is not a student of history, or of economic policy.

For Trump, it’s more about a big applause line at his election rallies. But keeping a destructive campaign pledge – one that would damage the nation’s most populous state – isn’t presidential. It’s stupid.

This story was originally published March 8, 2018 at 2:50 PM with the headline "California would be a casualty of Trump’s trade war."

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER