Living

Who Gets the Netflix Password? Inside a Modern Divorce Settlement

A picture of the divorce paper, left, and Ladan Richardson, right.
A picture of the divorce paper, left, and Ladan Richardson, right. Peter Dazeley/Getty Images & Ladan Richardson

Divorce settlements often focus on homes, savings and childcare-but as daily life becomes increasingly shaped by subscriptions, some couples find themselves negotiating far more modern assets.

For Ladan Richardson, now 33, that reality took an unexpected form during her divorce in November 2022, when a judge asked her what she wanted included in the final settlement.

Her answer, she said, was partly serious and partly framed with humor: the car, the dog-and continued access to her ex‑husband's Netflix account.

What began as a lighthearted moment in court ultimately made its way into the official divorce agreement, which specified that Richardson would retain access to the account indefinitely.

 A picture of the divorce papers that specified the Netflix clause.
A picture of the divorce papers that specified the Netflix clause.

"The Netflix password clause came up when the judge asked me directly what I wanted out of the divorce," Richardson told Newsweek. "I said all I wanted was the car, the dog, and his Netflix password."

Richardson says she was surprised when the clause was included in the final paperwork, but it has held up since. She still has access to the account, with her own profile intact.

"I wasn't trying to be cruel or vindictive," she said. "It was one small thing at the end of a really heavy process."

The Everyday Costs of Separating

Family law experts say requests like Richardson's, while uncommon, reflect a broader reality of modern-day divorce: the mundane economics of daily life can shift dramatically when households split.

"There are obvious economies of scale to living together that are lost when couples separate," Katherine Miller, founder and managing partner of Miller Law Group and author of The Emotionally Savvy Divorce, told Newsweek. "And there can be a real temptation to try to preserve those-whether for financial savings, a sense of ongoing connection, or some other reason."

Streaming services, phone plans, cloud storage and shared digital accounts have become cultural infrastructure-small individually, but cumulative in cost. For some divorcing couples, those losses can feel surprisingly concrete.

newsweek photography

Still, Miller said, lawyers are typically hesitant to formalize arrangements like password sharing in legally binding documents.

"In practice, lawyers are quite reluctant to enshrine arrangements like this in a settlement, and for good reason," she said.

One issue, Miller explained, is how quickly technology changes.

"If an agreement refers specifically to Netflix, what happens if Netflix is acquired, rebrands, or merges with another platform?" she said. "You can find yourself with future conflict-or even litigation-baked into the document from day one."

Enforceability also becomes a concern.

"If one party simply refuses to share a password, what is the other realistically going to do?" Miller said. "Go back to court and ask a judge to compel them? That's not a good use of anyone's time, and it certainly isn't a good use of scarce court resources."

 Pictures of Ladan Richardson who had the Netflix clause included in her divorce.
Pictures of Ladan Richardson who had the Netflix clause included in her divorce.

What Do These Request Really Signal?

In Miller's view, clauses like this are often less about the service itself than what it represents at a moment of significant emotional and financial upheaval.

"Often, when a party asks for something like this, there is a deeper issue at play-around financial insecurity, emotional attachment, or the difficulty of letting go," she said. "Those are understandable impulses, but they're better addressed directly rather than papered over with a subscription clause."

Miller added that it is usually more effective to adjust the financial terms of a settlement to reflect what is actually at stake, rather than tying former spouses together through ongoing shared services.

For Richardson, the clause functioned less as a long‑term expectation than as a moment of levity during a deeply personal transition.

"Divorce can take so much from you all at once," she said. She explained that finding moments of humor helped her regain a sense of control during the separation.

Looking back, she says, the Netflix clause was never about winning or holding on to the past.

"It was one small thing that made a heavy process feel lighter," Richardson said.

2026 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

This story was originally published May 10, 2026 at 3:00 AM.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER