You're in the Opinion section

EDITORIAL: Flawed law forces court to OK text threats

Published online on Tuesday, Nov. 03, 2009

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Comments (0)

How should a school react when a high school student sends a text message like this: "im gonna come to school with one of phillips gun and kill half the school ill load everyone with bullets and then shoot myself in the head right in front of u."

Is this simply a melodramatic display, a Pleasant Valley High School student in the Chico Unified district reacting all out of proportion to a girlfriend breaking off a relationship -- or a credible threat to others and himself?

In this case, the student who received the message told a friend and word spread to other students, one of whom told the Chico police. The sender was arrested and prosecuted for a misdemeanor offense. The juvenile court placed the 16-year-old on informal probation and ordered him to write a 500-word essay on the Columbine High School shootings.

But the message on electronic threats now is mixed, because a state appeals court ruled last week that the sender did not threaten any physical harm to the person who received the message: "That text states C. C. will shoot 'half the school' and then shoot himself in front of S. It does not threaten harm to her."

The law narrowly limits the definition of threat to the person receiving the message. Unfortunately, the ruling sends the perverse message to adults that it is OK to make threats, so long as you don't threaten the person to whom you are sending an electronic communication. The law itself is flawed and needs fixing.

That said, criminal prosecution should not be a first resort in dealing with teenagers. Immature students, no doubt, will continue to make threats, and most will never carry them out. We ought to be wary of criminalizing emotional turmoil in minors.

Schools cannot ignore violent threats. In most cases, students need a swift message from their parents and school that they must take responsibility for their actions. A 500-word essay and supervision was an appropriate punishment -- and the school itself could have imposed it without resorting to the courts.


Tell us what you think. Comment on this editorial by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, then click on the editorial.

A few rules are needed to help foster a feeling of community. We encourage a free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect, but any post that violates someone's right to use and enjoy fresnobee.com is prohibited. Before you post, please read the terms of use and obey these simple guidelines.

Here are the ground rules:

  1. Be yourself. A nickname will be used for posts, but if an editor finds a user without a verifiable name, that user will be warned or banned.
  2. Keep it clean. Foul language (defined by prime-time standards) will not be tolerated. Neither will the intentional misspelling of foul language or the use of non-English curse words.
  3. Be truthful. Do not lie or link to sites that may be considered libelous, defamatory or false.
  4. Be nice. Don't harass anyone. Don't threaten anyone. Don't use racial slurs. Don't post anything sexually explicit.
  5. Be an individual. Do not advertise or solicit. Do not harvest any information for business use.
  6. Be original. Do not post copyrighted material.
  7. Follow the law. Don't do anything or post anything considered illegal by city, county, state or federal regulations and laws.

more videos »