You're in the Opinion section

EDITORIAL: Water package is at least an improvement

Compromise is needed to make any progress.

Published online on Saturday, Oct. 31, 2009

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Comments (0)

California lawmakers face an epic moment in the state's wrangling over water. They now are mulling an imperfect but much-needed package of reforms for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and state water use.

If approved with a reasonable amount of funding, this package holds promise for kick-starting restoration of the Delta, improving monitoring of groundwater, financing new water storage and reducing wasteful water practices and illegal diversions of water.

The package would also ensure a full study of new ways for moving water through and around the Delta, including construction of a canal.

California last faced such stark choices in 1982: Voters were asked to approve a peripheral canal that a divided Legislature had authorized two years before. Voters rejected it.

We can't let this opportunity pass this time. The status quo has not served anyone's interests. The Delta has continued to decline. Fish are in decline. Farm districts and cities have seen water deliveries reduced. The federal courts are threatening to take over the management of water in the Delta.

Take a step back and examine the larger picture. Delta levees continue to erode. More could collapse in an earthquake. Efforts to restore wetlands, an essential filter and form of habitat in the Delta, have been fitful. Not enough work has been done to ensure efficient use of urban water supplies.

The package isn't perfect. But for California to make any progress on water, there must be compromise. The bottom line is this policy package is a vast improvement over the status quo.

Failure to modernize the state's water policies could mean another generation of frustration, litigation and agriculture on the decline.


Tell us what you think. Comment on this editorial by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, then click on the editorial.

A few rules are needed to help foster a feeling of community. We encourage a free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect, but any post that violates someone's right to use and enjoy fresnobee.com is prohibited. Before you post, please read the terms of use and obey these simple guidelines.

Here are the ground rules:

  1. Be yourself. A nickname will be used for posts, but if an editor finds a user without a verifiable name, that user will be warned or banned.
  2. Keep it clean. Foul language (defined by prime-time standards) will not be tolerated. Neither will the intentional misspelling of foul language or the use of non-English curse words.
  3. Be truthful. Do not lie or link to sites that may be considered libelous, defamatory or false.
  4. Be nice. Don't harass anyone. Don't threaten anyone. Don't use racial slurs. Don't post anything sexually explicit.
  5. Be an individual. Do not advertise or solicit. Do not harvest any information for business use.
  6. Be original. Do not post copyrighted material.
  7. Follow the law. Don't do anything or post anything considered illegal by city, county, state or federal regulations and laws.

more videos »