You're in the Opinion section

EDITORIAL: State spending on fleet sped up its insolvency

Published online on Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2009

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Comments (0)

June 30, 2009, was fiscal meltdown day for the state of California. The Legislature had not passed a budget, tax revenues were plummeting, the state controller was paying bills with IOUs and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was poised to announce a third furlough day each month for state workers.

That very day the state Department of Transportation signed off on purchasing $1.7 million worth of new trucks and truck bodies.

That spending came on top of $2.6 million on truck expenditures by the DOT during the previous five months, even as the state's fiscal crisis deepened. In February, the Department of General Services, state government's primary purchasing agent, spent another $1.2 million on 50 new hybrid Toyota Priuses.

A Sacramento Bee investigation has found that most of those new vehicles -- as well as scores more purchased in recent years -- sit unused for months and even years.

A Caltrans spokesman blamed its purchase of unused new trucks on the state's "changing priorities" and "fluctuating workloads."

A spokesman for DGS, which bought the 50 hybrid Toyota Priuses, said the state didn't want to miss a factory cutoff date to purchase 2009 models. In addition, he said, the departments that initially wanted them may have changed their minds after the governor signed an executive order directing all departments to reduce their vehicle fleets by 15%.

All the excuses sound lame, frankly. The state's fiscal house of cards was collapsing but the state's purchasing agents were conducting "business as usual."

Any budget-conscious business or household confronted with the economic challenges of California would have curtailed unnecessary expenditures.

It would have delayed or even canceled the purchase of 50 brand new Priuses at $24,000 each or $4.3 million worth of trucks for which there was no immediate need. Officials in charge of buying cars in California just kept on buying.

That explains, in part, why California remains mired in a fiscal mess.


Tell us what you think. Comment on this editorial by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, then click on the editorial.

A few rules are needed to help foster a feeling of community. We encourage a free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect, but any post that violates someone's right to use and enjoy fresnobee.com is prohibited. Before you post, please read the terms of use and obey these simple guidelines.

Here are the ground rules:

  1. Be yourself. A nickname will be used for posts, but if an editor finds a user without a verifiable name, that user will be warned or banned.
  2. Keep it clean. Foul language (defined by prime-time standards) will not be tolerated. Neither will the intentional misspelling of foul language or the use of non-English curse words.
  3. Be truthful. Do not lie or link to sites that may be considered libelous, defamatory or false.
  4. Be nice. Don't harass anyone. Don't threaten anyone. Don't use racial slurs. Don't post anything sexually explicit.
  5. Be an individual. Do not advertise or solicit. Do not harvest any information for business use.
  6. Be original. Do not post copyrighted material.
  7. Follow the law. Don't do anything or post anything considered illegal by city, county, state or federal regulations and laws.

more videos »