You're in the Opinion section

EDITORIAL: Let Waste Management expand Kettleman site

Published online on Wednesday, Oct. 07, 2009

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Comments (0)

The Kings County Planning Commission has been looking at whether a controversial expansion of a hazardous waste landfill near Kettleman City is in the public interest. The hearings have drawn overflow crowds, and many residents are angry at the proposal.

That's not surprising. No one wants to live near a hazardous waste landfill, and we understand the reluctance of Kettleman City residents to see the possibility of the Waste Management facility getting even larger.

But the proposal by Waste Management is partly the result of California's restrictive environmental regulations. As a state, we have decided that we want environmental hazards removed from contaminated sites, and that material be disposed of properly.

You can't say get rid of hazardous material, but don't dump it anywhere.

We believe that Waste Management's proposal is a reasonable one, given California's environmental regulations. The Kettleman Hills facility is highly regulated, and has a good safety record. This plan would extend the hazardous waste capacity by 30 years.

But Waste Management's plan has been contentious from the start, and the issue has split the community, and in some cases families.

Supporters told commissioners Monday that the facility is safe, needed and should be allowed to expand. Opponents want the expansion stopped until health officials determine what caused five birth defects in the area. But Kings County officials say there is no evidence of an unusual number of birth defects.

Kettleman City is just over three miles from the Kettleman Hills landfill, which is on 1,600 acres. About 474 acres are authorized for treatment, storage and disposal operations for hazardous waste and designated waste, and for disposal operations for municipal solid waste.

The proposal is to expand the hazardous waste landfill by 14 acres and add a 64-acre landfill.

We have yet to hear a workable alternative to Waste Management's expansion plan. The proposal should be approved.


Tell us what you think. Comment on this editorial by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, then click on the editorial.

A few rules are needed to help foster a feeling of community. We encourage a free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect, but any post that violates someone's right to use and enjoy fresnobee.com is prohibited. Before you post, please read the terms of use and obey these simple guidelines.

Here are the ground rules:

  1. Be yourself. A nickname will be used for posts, but if an editor finds a user without a verifiable name, that user will be warned or banned.
  2. Keep it clean. Foul language (defined by prime-time standards) will not be tolerated. Neither will the intentional misspelling of foul language or the use of non-English curse words.
  3. Be truthful. Do not lie or link to sites that may be considered libelous, defamatory or false.
  4. Be nice. Don't harass anyone. Don't threaten anyone. Don't use racial slurs. Don't post anything sexually explicit.
  5. Be an individual. Do not advertise or solicit. Do not harvest any information for business use.
  6. Be original. Do not post copyrighted material.
  7. Follow the law. Don't do anything or post anything considered illegal by city, county, state or federal regulations and laws.

more videos »