Similar stories:
•
Academy Awards' director category contains groundbreakers
Kathryn Bigelow sounds a wee bit tired of questions about being a "female director," but given that on Tuesday, she became only the fourth woman to be nominated for best director by the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, she knows it comes with the territory.
"I long personally for the day when the modifier is a moot point," said a very happy Bigelow, whose film nabbed nine nominations, including one for best picture. "I anticipate that day will come, but if 'The Hurt Locker' can make the impossible seem possible to somebody, it's pretty overwhelming and gratifying. At least we're heading in the right direction."
"The Hurt Locker," Bigelow's stunningly visceral examination of life in a bomb-disposal squad in Iraq, is the culmination of more than 25 years in the business, and an aesthetic that defies conventional notions of gender (where women directors are often relegated to romantic comedies.) Her films include the vampire flick "Near Dark" and the surf thriller "Point Break," as well as the
•
Populist fare Blind Side,' District 9,' Up' make Oscar final cut
They are precisely the kinds of movies hardly ever nominated for the best-picture Oscar - a tear-jerker sports film, a space-alien thriller and an animated feature with a flying house and talking dogs - but the populist pleasures "The Blind Side," "District 9" and "Up" all made the final cut for the top Academy Award.
Concerned that a steady stream of challenging, often little-seen art movies were dominating the Oscars and deflating television ratings, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences doubled this year's best-picture race to 10 contestants, and the results Tuesday were exactly as intended: the inclusion of movies that have sold a boatload of tickets.
The nominations for the 82nd annual Academy Awards were led by the presumptive best picture favorites - "Avatar" and "The Hurt Locker," which each scored in nine categories. The two movies represent opposite extremes of audience recognition, as "Avatar" has generated almost 50 times more domestic revenue than "The Hurt Locker."
•
Dear John' might threaten Avatar's' perch at box office
"Avatar" will have to fight off "The Hurt Locker" at next month's Academy Awards, but James Cameron's sci-fi blockbuster faces a more imminent threat this weekend: losing the top spot at the box office.
For seven consecutive weeks, "Avatar" has ruled the domestic charts. The film surpassed the writer-director's "Titanic" on Tuesday for the biggest domestic gross in Hollywood history, as "Avatar's" North American receipts of more than $601.1 million improved upon "Titanic's" haul of $598.5 million. "Avatar" previously beat "Titanic's" global record gross of $1.8 billion, with worldwide ticket sales of more than $2 billion and counting.
For all the records that the Pandoran fantasy has amassed, it will not outdo one of "Titanic's" most remarkable achievements: holding the No. 1 box-office position for 15 straight weekends.
•
'Avatar,' 'Hurt Locker' lead Oscar nominations
LOS ANGELES - "Avatar" and "The Hurt Locker" have been duking it out all awards season. Now, the two films face their final showdown: They enter the 82nd annual Academy Awards prizefight with nine nominations apiece.
The films - which, coincidentally, are by former husband-and-wife James Cameron and Kathryn Bigelow - couldn't be more different. "Avatar" is an eye-popping 3-D science-fiction studio extravaganza: It is the most expensive film ever made and has gone on to be the most successful film ever, earning more than $2 billion so far, worldwide. By contrast, "The Hurt Locker" is a gritty, low-budget, independent film about a bomb-disposal unit in the Iraq War. Though it has earned plenty of accolades this awards season, it has yet to crack the $13-million mark at the box office.
The films are two of the best picture nominees announced Tuesday morning by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, among an eclectic mix that included another sci-fi hit, "District 9," another war film, "Inglourious
•
The best and worst movies of 2009
Another film year has come to an end, leaving in its wake both memorable movies and those that should be forgotten.
The surprising part about this year's batch of good movies was how many filmmakers pushed past the expected. A movie like "(500)" Days of Summer" stood out against all of the other romantic efforts because director Marc Webb dared to use animated fantasy and captivating film techniques.
"Hurt Locker" proved that good war movies can still be made and "Where the Wild Things Are" took familiar children's material and brought it magically to life on film. Maybe the most shocking was how J.J. Abrams gave new life to the much beloved "Star Trek" franchise.
A lack of originality was the key to picking the worst movies. Just casting familiar names is not enough to justify asking moviegoers to pay hard-earned money. These movies lacked originality, energy and style.
Here's a final look at the best and worst of 2009.
10 Best
1. "Where the Wild Things Are" : Director Spike
Chris Hedges, in his stunning book "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning," wrote that "war is a drug."
Those provocative words precede "The Hurt Locker," one of the best war movies I've seen.
This exciting, draining and cerebral film does more than just nail a philosophical point to the wall and then ignore it. It's daring enough to follow through on its thoughtful premise. As we become immersed in the hard-edged depiction of U.S. soldiers in Baghdad who dismantle bombs for a living, we're given a taste of the euphoria and adrenaline rush that soldiers experience in the field -- as well as their tedium, fear and pride.
"The Hurt Locker" becomes, in a sense, a delivery system -- albeit an imperfect one -- for the drug of war. We feel its silky, seductive rush. And shiver at its brutal price.
Kathryn Bigelow, whose unblinking direction and stomach-churning storytelling set the tone, works with a taut, fierce screenplay by Mark Boal. (There were more than a few times that I forgot I wasn't watching a documentary.) She focuses on three U.S. Army team members in the current Iraq war who are part of a unit that tries to defuse the roadside bombs that have become such a part of life in Baghdad.
The most solid member of the team is Sgt. J.T. Sanborn (Anthony Mackie), who's a rule follower but certainly isn't blinded by the glamour of war. Specialist Owen Eldridge (Brian Geraghty), younger and more inexperienced, is scared of dying, which makes him hesitant in the field. They're both a bit mystified by Staff Sgt. William James (Jeremy Renner in a caustic, aching and profound performance), a daredevil addition to their squad, who flouts safety regulations and prides himself on cheating death.
Much of the film is caught up in the tick-tock tenseness of confronting live bombs as the soldiers stare down each day's job assignment. If you wanted to look at this as an "action" film -- and it does have plenty -- these scenes would be like the elaborate stunts that form the foundation of the genre. But there's more here than a series of adrenaline rushes. Tying together the film is an arc that seems almost primal -- not interested at all in political ideologies or morality, but rather confronting humanity's underlying impulses toward conflict.
The film doesn't neglect the nitty-gritty of combat, and Bigelow has a knack for letting the small details swell with profundity: a soldier spits on bullets to get the blood off them so they won't jam in the gun; a fly crawls on the eyelash of another as he takes sight of a distant target; an offer of a juice box in the heat of the desert becomes a moment of tenderness.
At its heart, however, "The Hurt Locker" has an almost dreamy separation from war itself. We feel the power of the drug. And we realize that those who take it will never be the same.
@Nyx.CommentBody@