Tweaks in House water bill cheer California environmentalists

McClatchy NewspapersJune 20, 2014 

Water is released at 110 cubic feet per second into the San Joaquin River at Friant Dam, according to Michael Wolfe, supervisor of hydro-tech with the Bureau of Reclamaiton, Thursday morning, May 15, 2014.

ERIC PAUL ZAMORA — THE FRESNO BEE Buy Photo

California environmentalists are claiming victory this week, or at least a temporary one, over a key House committee's decision to drop some San Joaquin Valley water provisions from a big spending bill.

Without much debate or explanation, the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday eliminated the controversial Valley provisions from a $34 billion energy and water funding package. The overall bill operates the Interior Department's Bureau of Reclamation and Army Corps of Engineers for Fiscal 2015.

The draft bill passed earlier by a House subcommittee had included language that appeared to steer water away from California's wildlife refuges and habitat protection and toward farm irrigation. Even experienced California water lobbyists confessed they weren't entirely sure how the language popped up, though it looked like a placeholder for a potential drought relief plan lawmakers are still negotiating.

The Senate energy and water funding bill, shepherded by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, does not have similar language. By dropping it, House committee leaders avoided a potential floor hang-up.

"Given how important that funding is for water purchases at the refuges, it's not an overstatement to say that this rider would have caused a catastrophe," Mike Lynes, Audubon California's director of public policy, said in a statement.

The House bill includes $37 million, the same as this year, for Bay-Delta restoration work, among other California provisions.

The reporter can be reached at mdoyle@mcclatchydc.com.

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service