EDITORIAL: California leads way in efforts to cut reliance on fossil fuels

FresnoJune 5, 2014 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations proposed Monday by the Obama administration will have a familiar ring to Californians, though they're groundbreaking nationally.

Aimed at slashing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, the new rules -- like the EPA's recent California-based fuel economy standards -- have the larger mission of curbing greenhouse gases.

Like programs that have been in place here since 2012, they encourage participation in cap-and-trade markets. For the record, President Reagan was a fan of cap and trade.

And, like California's initiatives, they're serious about making a difference. The burning of fossil fuels to generate electricity is one of the largest single contributors to global warming, and the proposed rules would cut power plant emissions by 30% from 2005 levels in 15 years.

Nonetheless, the blowback has begun, with threats of lawsuits and congressional intervention. Particularly incensed are friends of the coal industry, which, as usual, claims that any effort to make it clean up its act will kill jobs and burden families.

The critics should calm down. For one thing, the proposed rules are flexible, offering a range of ways to get to the target. For another, the nation is halfway to the proposed target, thanks to the recent recession and a move to cheaper and cleaner natural gas.

Arguments about jobs and burdened families also are specious. Yes, coal jobs may be lost. Coal-based electricity has been steadily declining in California, though a few utilities -- Los Angeles' in particular -- still rely heavily on coal-fired plants.

The Modesto Irrigation District, for instance, gets only 15% of its energy portfolio from imported coal power. At PG&E, coal-fired electricity makes up a mere thirteenth of 1% of retail sales.

But anyone who has checked in on the natural gas boom in Kern County knows that, whatever fuels the nation's power plants, energy employment in general isn't going anywhere. Nor will coal disappear.

About 39% of the nation's electricity comes from coal-fired plants now, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The new rules would probably drive coal down to about 30%, still a significant amount.

As for families, there are burdens and then there are burdens. Adjusted for inflation, residential electricity rates are at a historic low in this country. And clean air is priceless if you are among the 6.8 million American families with an asthmatic child.

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service