EDITORIAL: A bipartisan U.S. Senate displays its arrogance

FresnoFebruary 3, 2014 

On Friday, the vast majority of the United States senators, in a bipartisan display of arrogance, proved once more how little they think of the people who elect them.

Most senators, including those who face re-election in 2014, failed to file their public campaign finance reports online with the Federal Election Commission — again.

Candidates for House seats, for the presidency, and for most state legislatures long ago began filing their campaign reports electronically, posting them on the Internet for any interested voter to see.

But not the U.S. Senate.

They get away with ignoring the Internet because they make their own rules. Acting like emperors, they collectively have decided that the identities of their donors and how they spend their campaign money are nobody's business.

The Center for Public Integrity, a nonpartisan investigative reporting operation based in Washington, D.C., is the latest news organization to criticize the Senate for failing to file reports online. It reported last week that as many as 80 senators fail to file online.

The center also reported that the Senate financial services bill included an e-filing requirement. But when the bill was folded into the larger budget bill approved in January, the e-filing provision had disappeared.

"The disappearance disappointed advocates for the practice, such as Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., who has championed e-filing legislation. His stand-alone bill requiring Senate e-filing has yet to receive a vote," Rachel Baye of The Center for Public Integrity wrote in a Jan. 28 story.

There is nothing to prevent senators from voluntarily filing their reports. Some do. California Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer routinely file their reports online.

In the past, Feinstein promised to force the issue. But she failed to persuade her colleagues that they ought to enter the Internet age. It's simply not a high enough priority.

Most senators take the carrier pigeon route, printing out reports and mailing them to the Senate secretary. The secretary faxes the reports to the Federal Election Commission, which copies and delivers them to a private vendor. There, clerks key-punch in some of the information and return the reports to the Federal Election Commission, which posts them online, days or weeks after they've been filed.

"The process costs taxpayers roughly $500,000 a year, according to the Congressional Budget Office," Baye wrote.

We can only conclude that it's not the senators' money, so they don't care. Voters should.

Comment by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, and clicking on the editorial.

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service