EDITORIAL: Devil is in details of plastic bag ban legislation

FresnoFebruary 2, 2014 

Senate Bill 270 would prohibit groceries and pharmacies from distributing carryout plastic bags starting July 1, 2015.


Sometimes, what's made necessary by politics doesn't make for good policy. While there is a worthy goal behind a bill to ban disposable plastic bags at California grocery stores, some dicey deals have been made to boost its chances of becoming law.

Before approving what would be the nation's first statewide ban on plastic bags, legislators must make sure consumers and the environment are the big winners.

Senate Bill 270 would prohibit groceries and pharmacies from distributing carryout plastic bags starting on July 1, 2015. Only thicker bags strong enough for at least 125 uses and with at least 20% recycled content could be provided.

The bill would extend to convenience stores and liquor outlets on July 1, 2016. It would not pre-empt local bans already in place in about 90 cities and counties, or others adopted before Sept. 1.

Lawmakers can improve the bill by focusing on a few areas.

One is the "no less than 10 cents" that grocery stores would collect from customers who need or want paper bags. Environmental groups and others supporting the measure say the fee is needed to encourage shoppers to bring their own reusable bags instead of using paper bags, which have their own environmental costs.

But this charge must not be a money-maker for grocery chains.

The California Grocers Association, which backs the bill, says that isn't the intent. Supporters say that 10 cents, the amount in most local plastic bag bans, is roughly the cost to provide paper bags. They also say that shoppers now pay for "free" plastic bags because the cost is hidden in the price of groceries.

The bill's draft language does not cap how much can be charged for a paper bag. Legislators must make clear that it cannot exceed the cost of providing it — or that any extra amount should not go to stores, but to a public purpose.

A good one would be to boost the recycling of all plastic bags. The track record for grocery stores is mixed, at best. Safeway, an industry leader, refuses to even discuss the issue.

A 2006 law requires groceries and large retailers to make it easy for consumers to return used bags. CalRecycle, however, is no longer collecting good numbers, much less enforcing the law. The latest figures are for 2009, when regulated stores statewide collected about 1,500 tons of plastic carryout bags for recycling of the nearly 53,000 tons they bought. That is a paltry rate of 3%.

Sen. Alex Padilla, the bill's main author, told The Sacramento Bee's editorial board that he is willing to look at ways to boost recycling. But he and others behind the bill argue that the better solution is to phase out disposable plastic bags entirely. As many as 20 billion are used by Californians each year.

There also are questions about a significant sweetener added to the new version of the bill — $2 million for plastic bag makers to re-engineer their plants to make reusable bags. A plant receiving aid would have to retrain and keep its workers.

Preserving these blue-collar, middle-class jobs is certainly important.

As Padilla tries to solidify support in the Senate, where last year's bill fell three votes short of the 21 needed to pass, the new version will go through Assembly policy committees.

The details will matter. It's up to legislators to make sure that no flaws in the bill come back to bite taxpayers.


Comment by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, and clicking on the editorial.

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service