EDITORIAL: China hurts its future with media suppression

December 16, 2013 

China's leader, Xi Jinping, has plans to open China's economy through private investment. But the government also appears prepared to expel two dozen journalists. The United States and the international community should exert pressure on China not to engage in media suppression.


China's leader, Xi Jinping, made headlines weeks ago with plans to further open up China's economy through private investment and adoption of cleaner, greener technology. The United States should welcome this transition, but not if Xi simultaneously cracks down on the free flow of information from China, including coverage by foreign correspondents.

China appears prepared to expel two dozen journalists employed by the New York Times and Bloomberg News by refusing to renew their visas by year's end.

The Times and Bloomberg have reported on the wealth accumulated by Chinese leaders and their families, a topic that Chinese officials view as off limits. Since 2012, Chinese authorities have refused to renew or issue visas for reporters from Reuters and al-Jazeera, presumably because of their human-rights reporting.

Vice President Joe Biden, to his credit, made treatment of U.S. journalists an issue during his recent visit to Asia. The United States cannot build a stronger relationship with China – financial or otherwise — if foreign coverage is stifled and information is limited to what Chinese leaders choose to release.

The United States should not respond in kind by denying visas to some of the hundreds of Chinese journalists in the United States, all of whom are employed by government-controlled media outlets. If the United States hopes to advocate for press freedom, it cannot engage in a media cold war.

But there are ways the United States and international community can exert pressure. China hopes to host the 2022 Winter Olympics. The International Olympic Committee should not consider China's bid so long as China is limiting access of foreign media.

China is interested in negotiating a bilateral investment treaty with the United States to make it easier for China to invest in U.S. property and companies, and for the United States to do the same in China.

Yet as the China observer Bill Bishop has noted, restrictions on media coverage would reduce information flow between the two countries, and "both sides will be unable to make informed investment decisions." He says that the Obama administration should make media and researcher access a condition of treaty talks, and be willing to walk away if Beijing balks.

The United States needs to send a clear signal that in an increasingly digitally connected world, China will hurt its own future by exiling nettlesome messengers and trying to embargo information.


Comment by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, and clicking on the editorial.

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service