Brandi Orth has been around elected officials for a long time. Now, she's going to try and become one herself.
Orth, 57, announced Wednesday that she will seek the post next year of Fresno County clerk, a job best known for voter registration and overseeing county elections, but one that comes with other tasks as well, including conducting civil marriage ceremonies.
And, yes, it's true: Orth already holds the job.
But she was appointed — and not elected — by a unanimous vote of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors in January 2012. Her selection came a week after former Clerk Victor Salazar unexpectedly resigned.
At the time, Orth was a policy analyst who worked for the county administrative officer — a position that worked closely with the five elected supervisors. Before that, Orth worked for a decade in the clerk's office.
"I realized all the work experience and career path had prepared me for this job," she said Wednesday at the Veterans Memorial Auditorium in downtown Fresno after being introduced by Supervisor Phil Larson.
So this will be Orth's first run for elected office.
Still, she had to hit the ground running after her appointment, as 2012 was a presidential election year. This year — normally a quiet off year in the election cycle — has proved to be equally busy, with three unscheduled elections.
The big question is whether Orth will face any challengers for the post, which pays $121,442 annually.
Like Orth, Salazar was appointed to the post to replace Susan Anderson, who left the office after winning a seat on the county Board of Supervisors.
That was in January 2001.
The next year, Salazar had an opponent — and beat him. But in 2006 and 2010 re-election bids, Salazar was unopposed.
— John Ellis
Fresno County still stumbling on First 5
Fresno County Supervisors Judy Case and Debbie Poochigian again this week made it clear that they are opposed to First 5 Fresno County's plan to build a new $15 million downtown headquarters.
The issue was so pressing, they said, that an emergency addition was needed to Tuesday's board agenda so they could discuss the matter further and make absolutely certain that County Administrative Officer John Navarrette sent a letter to the agency expressing the concerns of the board's majority.
But the request required four votes on the five-member board — and it only got three. Besides Case and Poochigian, Supervisor Phil Larson also backed adding the item to the agenda.
Supervisors Andreas Borgeas and Henry R. Perea, however, didn't feel Case and Poochigian made their case for the last-second addition.
"What's the emergency?" Perea repeatedly asked.
County Counsel Kevin Briggs backed that position, saying an emergency was like a fire or a flood. This, he said, was more like an urgency than an emergency.
But Case continued to press the matter, saying it was, indeed, an emergency because First 5 commissioners were moving ahead with the project, even after the supervisors expressed dissatisfaction with the building.
Poochigian and Case have written to the commission with their concerns, but they both wanted an official letter on behalf of the Board of Supervisors.
The problem is that during an exhaustive discussion of the matter at its Oct. 8 meeting, Case offered up multiple motions opposing the First 5 building, but none of them specifically directed staff to draft and send a letter.
Navarrette pointed out as much on Tuesday.
In fact, it's unclear what the board approved because two similar but different motions were offered up ahead of the vote, which passed 3-1, with Perea in opposition and Borgeas abstaining.
The First 5 project will be built on agency-owned property along Tulare Street, between N and O streets, adjacent to the Fresno County Library. It is currently a parking lot. The building will include a child care center, classroom space and a community conference room in addition to First 5's administrative offices.
Case, Poochigian and Larson think the building isn't a wise use of funds for the agency.
The issue certainly isn't over. The matter is already an official agenda item for the board's Tuesday meeting, and the supervisors are likely to resume their criticism of the project — and, this time, maybe officially direct Navarrette to draft a letter saying as much to the agency.
— John Ellis