EDITORIAL: 'Constitutional sheriffs' in Calif. abuse their positions

FresnoAugust 24, 2013 

Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims told a Washington, D.C., audience on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2013 that immigration is a public safety issue. She said many immigrants were afraid to report crimes because they feared, even as victims, that they could end up being deported. She said the relationship must be improved, and she disagrees that providing a path to citizenship is rewarding them for breaking the law. "I call it a reboot of our system," Mims said.

CRAIG KOHLRUSS — The Fresno Bee Buy Photo

County sheriffs in California take oaths promising to uphold and defend the laws and constitutions of California and the United States.

But a growing group of sheriffs in this state and in other states have signed on to tenets of a deeply misguided and ill-informed organization whose reckless rhetoric directly challenges federal and state laws.

Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims is among them.

So far, members affiliated with the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association have merely rattled sabers, and have not overtly defied duly adopted laws. But they are not shy about expressing disdain for state and federal regulations. In so doing, these law enforcement officials foster contempt for the laws they promise to uphold.

As elected law enforcement officers, sheriffs have bully pulpits. By pushing rhetoric that encourages law enforcement officers to neglect state laws, these self-proclaimed "constitutional sheriffs" abuse their positions in favor of ideology. Their stated intent is to pick and choose which laws to enforce, especially gun-control measures.

This is relevant in California, where the Legislature has imposed tough gun-control measures, and is contemplating several measures this year to further limit access to certain types of firearms, and to restrict gun ownership by people who have been convicted of some misdemeanors, or have histories of mental illness.

The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association advocates a "line in the sand" approach to gun control, claiming a sheriff's responsibility is to reject enforcement of gun-control measures.

Three California sheriffs — Dean Wilson of Del Norte County, John D'Agostini of El Dorado County and Jon Lopey of Siskiyou County — are part of the organization's leadership. The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association lists 21 other sheriffs from California who have taken stands against any new federal gun-control measures.

Richard Mack founded the organization. Mack served two terms as sheriff in Graham County, Ariz., which has a population of 37,000. He ran for a congressional seat twice and lost by wide margins. Mack is fond of tea party catch phrases, promising in his mission statement to "protect us from tyranny" and "take our country back."

The organization says on its website that its aim is to recruit law enforcement officers to "issue our new Declaration to the Federal Government regarding the abuses that we will no longer tolerate or accept. Said declaration will be enforced by our Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers. In short, the CSPOA will be the army to set our nation free."

The association purports to act in the name of the U.S. Constitution. Certainly, its extremist rhetoric is protected by the First Amendment. But this tripe, coming from men and women who carry guns, and wear badges and uniforms, could encourage its own brand of lawlessness.


Tell us what you think. Comment on this editorial by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, then click on the editorial.

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service