EDITORIAL: Proper call on Manning

While he may not be a traitor, he deserves long prison sentence.

FresnoAugust 3, 2013 

A military judge made the right call, acquitting Bradley Manning of aiding the enemy while still holding him accountable for the largest leak of classified documents in U.S. history.

Prosecutors called the Army private a traitor, claiming that while he did not directly give information to the enemy, he knew he would be helping al-Qaida and other terrorist groups by making the secrets public.

But the government overreached by filing the most serious charge against Manning under a legal theory that had not been used since the Civil War, when a Union soldier was found guilty for giving a document to a Virginia newspaper.

Civil liberties and press freedom groups justifiably warned of the chilling effect on whistle-blowers and journalists because under the government's argument, almost any leak of secret documents could be construed as "aiding the enemy" since terrorist groups have wide access to nearly all media reports.

However naive or misguided, it appears that Manning, an intelligence analyst in Iraq, intended to expose misdeeds in the war on terror, including the extent of civilian casualties -- not to help Osama bin Laden.

While Manning may not be a traitor, he is certainly no hero. He may have been mistreated in detention, but he doesn't deserve to be lionized by sympathizers, who demonstrated outside the courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., and other locations.

Can they be so sure his vast data dump didn't endanger foreign service officers and U.S. troops?

Besides betraying his oath as a soldier, Manning put people at risk and damaged U.S. interests by copying more than 700,000 digital files and giving them to WikiLeaks, which initially didn't take care to black out names before posting them online.

Manning, one of only two people convicted under the 1917 Espionage Act for making classified information public, took some responsibility for what he did, pleading guilty to at least portions of 10 counts. A conviction for aiding the enemy would have put him in prison for life.

Still, Manning, 25, is going to the military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., for a long time after Army Col. Denise Lind convicted him of 20 lesser charges after a nearly two-month trial.

He should be punished severely. But the judge wisely made sure that whistle-blowers and journalists weren't collateral damage.

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service