Moderates will be put to the test as Calif. health care vote nears

The Sacramento BeeJune 24, 2013 

With Democrats set to lose their Assembly supermajority this week, moderates are in the hot seat as the house decides the fate of one of organized labor's top priorities.

A measure by Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez, which seeks to bar Walmart and other large employers from providing wages and hours low enough to qualify for Medi-Cal rolls, requires a two-thirds supermajority to pass.

The bill, expected to be acted upon Thursday by the Assembly, will test liberal Democrats' ability to control the Legislature before their opportunity evaporates. They'll learn whether moderates of their own party will stand with them or move to kill a bill labeled "job killer" by the California Chamber of Commerce.

"This is one of the first real, hard acid tests of the two-thirds supermajority casting an extraordinary vote for an obvious labor agenda," said Rob Stutzman, a GOP political consultant. "It will be interesting to see if two-thirds is enough."

Time is running out on Gomez because Assemblyman Bob Blumenfield will resign his seat Sunday to join the Los Angeles City Council, leaving the Assembly with 53 Democrats, one shy of a supermajority.

Key business and labor groups, lobbying hard on AB 880, say they will be watching carefully when moderate Democrats cast their vote.

"This is truly the first test of 'mods' in the Assembly — who are you, and are you real?" said Bill Dombrowski, president of the California Retailers Association and leader of the opposition to AB 880.

Jim Araby, director of the Western States Council of the United Food and Commercial Workers, a co-sponsor of the bill, said his union will remember who voted against AB 880 when California's 2014 election rolls around.

"This will definitely be a key issue in determining if we challenge certain Democrats," he said. "It's definitely going to be one of the issues that we judge that on."

California Labor Federation and UFCW, teaming to push AB 880, tout the bill as closing a loophole that allows the state's largest businesses — 500 employees or more — to avoid subsidizing employee medical insurance under next year's federal health care overhaul.

Federal law will penalize businesses if workers toiling 30 hours a week are forced to buy health insurance from a new state exchange next year because they are not covered by an employer plan. AB 880 would expand the concept to penalize large firms about $4,400 for each employee on Medi-Cal rolls if they work at least 12 hours per week.

"It's really just the largest, most profitable employers in the state that we're talking about — and it's an issue of basic fairness," said Steve Smith, spokesman for the California Labor Federation.

A high-powered coalition of restaurant, retail, grocer, farm and other business groups criticizes Gomez's legislation as premature.

"It has far-reaching consequences, well beyond what people advertise it to be," said Allan Zaremberg, president of the state chamber of commerce. The organization contends that targeting employers who hire part-time workers would make it harder for students, senior citizens, single parents and others to earn extra income.

"The bottom line is, it's just an attack on large employers," Dombrowski said.

Gomez, D-Los Angeles, has spent days negotiating with wary Democrats.

He introduced amendments Monday to delay implementation for one year, reduce penalties, exempt seasonal employees, and commit some money to underserved areas for Medi-Cal providers and for physician training.

Assemblyman Henry Perea, a Fresno Democrat who leads a bloc of Assembly moderates, called AB 880 "definitely one of the hottest issues of the year."

"We don't want large employers to use the state to subsidize worker health care by pushing them down to Medi-Cal rolls," he said.

"On the flip side, we need to make sure (AB 880) doesn't go so far that it drives business out of the state. It's a fine balance. That balance has not been reached yet."

Assembly Democrats Richard Bloom of Santa Monica, Sharon Quirk-Silva of Fullerton, Steve Fox of Lancaster, and Adam Gray of Merced are considered key votes in deciding AB 880's fate, according to Capitol and labor sources.

Medi-Cal serves about 250,000 people who work in firms meeting AB 880's threshold — about 44% of them in the restaurant or retail industries, according to Ken Jacobs, chairman of the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education.

Sponsors target Walmart in pushing AB 880, marking the latest in a long battle between organized labor and the non-union retail giant. But restaurant chains and other large firms also could be affected by the bill.

Walmart, in a written statement, said its wages and benefits "meet or exceed those offered by most competitors and our health care offerings go beyond the eligibility and affordability requirements of the Affordable Care Act."

New full-time workers are eligible for health benefits after six months, while part-time workers are eligible after one year of service if they work an average of 30 hours per week, Walmart said.

Walmart's lowest "associate-only" medical plan costs employees only $8.70 per week and offers benefits that include no lifetime maximum for covered expenses, preventive care covered at 100%, and a company contribution of $250 to help pay for medical expenses, the statement said.

 

The Fresno Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service