You're in the Opinion section

EDITORIAL: Protecting the right to vote is still as important as ever

Supreme Court should not move to weaken landmark 1965 act.

Friday, Mar. 01, 2013 | 12:25 AM

tool name

close
tool goes here
0 comments

One hard lesson from the 2012 election is that Americans' right to vote can't be taken for granted.

Too many had to wait too long or jump through too many hoops to reach the ballot box. Too many politicians schemed to tilt the outcome by putting hurdles in front of certain groups.

That's reason enough why Congress should support measures to modernize our election machinery, and why the U.S. Supreme Court should not undermine the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.

But Wednesday, the high court strongly hinted it is ready to roll back, if not entirely strike down, a key part of that law. Under Section 5, nine states, most in the South, and parts of seven others, including three counties in California, must get pre-clearance from the Department of Justice or a federal court before redrawing election districts or changing any voting procedures -- to make sure minority voters won't be disadvantaged.

In the Alabama case before the court, the law's opponents argue that it's unfair for those states to face scrutiny when so many blacks and Latinos are being elected and when practices like literacy tests and poll taxes are only in the history books.

The court, which is expected to rule by June, has already tweaked the law, ruling in 2009 that jurisdictions can get out of Section 5 by demonstrating a clean record over 10 years. That's what Merced County did to be taken off the list last August. Now, only three California counties -- Kings, Monterey and Yuba -- are still covered.

There's plenty of evidence that the court ought not to go further -- and should defer to our elected representatives. It was only after hearing testimony about continued, if more subtle, discrimination that Congress overwhelmingly voted in 2006 to extend Section 5 for 25 years. And last year's election demonstrates that the rights of voters need to be jealously safeguarded.

Indeed, challenges under Section 5 blocked some of the most egregious efforts to suppress the vote, such as requiring certain photo IDs and limiting early voting.

In the House of Representatives, nearly 170 Democrats are behind the Voter Empowerment Act, which calls for streamlining voter registration and for banning some practices used to try to purge registration rolls.

But this should be a bipartisan issue. Everyone should want free, fair and smooth elections.


Tell us what you think. Comment on this editorial by going to fresnobee.com/opinion, then click on the editorial.

Similar stories:

The Bee's story-comment system is provided by Disqus. To read more about it, see our Disqus FAQ page. If you post comments, please be respectful of other readers. Your comments may be removed and you may be blocked from commenting if you violate our terms of service. Comments flagged by the system as potentially abusive will not appear until approved by a moderator.

more videos »
Visit our video index