His tax initiative in trouble just two weeks before Election Day, Gov. Jerry Brown is re-tuning his campaign message by casting his initiative as a jobs measure in a bid to broaden its appeal.
The adjustment, made by Brown in a series of recent public appearances, reflects the urgency of a campaign that is seeking to untie itself from controversy about education spending and to blunt conservative attacks centered on the economy, the most significant issue to voters in this election year.
"I say Proposition 30 is about jobs, because it's about kids and teachers, and they produce the brains and the skills that make the jobs of the future possible," Brown told teachers in San Francisco on Saturday, before repeating the message at a Bay Area church the next day and in a campaign blitz Tuesday through Southern California and the San Joaquin Valley.
"There are 500,000 job openings in California today, but you've got to have the skills to be able to do it," Brown said at the Fresno Area Electrical Training Center. "So community colleges are important, UC's important, Cal State's important, and so is kindergarten through 12. That's the job connection. It's skill creation."
Though the Democratic governor previously has made broad reference to the initiative's significance to jobs and the economy, he had focused his campaign to raise the state sales tax and income taxes on California's highest earners almost exclusively on education and the $5.4 billion in cuts to schools and community colleges the initiative would prevent this year.
Brown continues to promote the initiative's impact on school funding most heavily. But because the initiative also would make money available for other programs, his message had become muddled in controversy with Molly Munger, the proponent of a rival tax measure, about Proposition 30's relative benefit to education.
The initiative is polling precariously near 50%.
"Employment is a major concern, and he's probably assuming it's going to be very much on people's minds as they vote in the presidential election," said Jack Pitney, a government professor at Claremont McKenna College.
"He's hoping to grab the coattails of the issue."
The effect of Brown's shifting rhetoric is unclear. The television ads he is airing -- the best measure of a campaign's public messaging -- do not make such an explicit connection to the economy, though the ads predate Brown's testing of the issue on the stump.
"It may be that he's trying this out on different audiences and seeing what response he gets," said Mark Baldassare, president of the Public Policy Institute of California. "He's got a couple of weeks to get this message out."
Brown has mentioned the idea before. He said in one television ad that "the California Dream was built on schools and colleges, giving everyone a chance at a job and a future."
Ace Smith, whose company, SCN Strategies, is running Brown's campaign, was asked if a more explicit economy-related appeal will be made in a television ad before Election Day.
"We'll see," he said. "Stay tuned."
Brown's opponents have taken notice.
Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, said Brown's repeated references to jobs "got us scratching our heads ... When he goes out there and speaks to schools and stuff, he's talking about education. Why he's pirouetting off that, I don't know."
The group, which has long argued the measure would hurt the economy, released a radio ad Tuesday calling Proposition 30 "just another tax increase that'll ... drive people and businesses out of California and make families poorer."
Bee staff writer John Ellis contributed to this report. The reporter can be reached at (916) 321-1215, firstname.lastname@example.org
or @davidsiders on Twitter.