You're in the Local - Capitol and California section

Lawmakers OK landmark water-system plan

Published online on Wednesday, Nov. 04, 2009

- jsanders@sacbee.com
Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here
Comments (0)

Lawmakers approved a momentous overhaul of California's ailing water system early this morning, but approval came only after Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg agreed to strip a $10 million earmark for a Sacramento project he personally has championed.

The five-bill package, including an $11 billion bond measure, ended months of tense negotiations involving scores of interest groups over how to bolster supply, improve delivery and solve environmental problems plaguing the water system.

"This vote will be remembered years from now," Assembly Republican leader Sam Blakeslee said after an all-night session that ended shortly before 6 a.m. today.

"This Legislature has been able to accomplish something that no Legislature has been able to accomplish in decades," Steinberg said. "We all know that people ask, 'Can this Legislature actually take on the biggest, most intractable problems, and find solutions?' The answer is yes."

A nearly 90-minute impasse in the Assembly, with the proposed $11 billion bond measure lacking a handful of votes for approval, ended minutes after Steinberg agreed to drop from the bill a $10 million earmark for a nonprofit tolerance center in Sacramento.

Call The Bee's Jim sanders, (916) 326-5538.
  • Story Dan Walters: Capitol labors long on water but produces a drop in the bucket
  • Story Water plan has local goodie
  • Here are components of the water package approved early this morning:

    FINANCING
    Borrows $11.14 billion to pay for dams, underground water banking, water recycling, Delta restoration and regional projects. Voters must approve the bond at the November 2010 election. It would cost the state about $800 million a year in debt service at its peak.

    DELTA OVERSIGHT
    Creates a seven-member council charged with adopting a long-range management plan for the environmentally troubled estuary by 2012. The plan would include strategies to boost the reliability of water exports while protecting the ecosystem.

    CANAL
    Does not authorize a long-envisioned canal to move water around the Delta southward. But the Delta council would incorporate the canal into its plans -- if it meets environmental standards.

    CONSERVATION
    Calls for a statewide per-capita urban water use reduction of 20 percent by 2020, but not every water district would have to meet that threshold. Agencies that don't meet targets would be ineligible for state grants and loans. Farm water suppliers would not face targets but would have to submit efficiency plans.

    GROUNDWATER MONITORING
    Requires agencies to report water levels in underground basins. Agencies that don't comply could lose grants.

    WATER RIGHTS
    Gives state water regulators more powers to police illegal water diversions, although specific penalties would have to be added later by the Legislature.

"I have worked my heart out to get this water package passed, and the last thing that I would ever want to do is to jeopardize this incredibly important work," he said of removing the earmark.

Steinberg, D-Sacramento, had requested the $10 million earmark for a tolerance center that he has championed for years and has assisted in raising millions for its construction.

The tolerance center is proposed for construction on the site of the old Sacramento City Unified School District headquarters at 16th and N streets.

The project is envisioned as a "statewide hub" to teach tolerance to students and encourage "collaborative problem-solving," according to its Web site.

Language in the bond bill stipulated only that the $10 million "shall be available for capital improvements to nonprofit facilities that provide watershed, environmental justice and urban greening education programs to students in the Sacramento City Unified School District and the surrounding area."

Steinberg, who has been the driving force behind the Legislature's efforts to revamp the state's creaking water system, defended inclusion in the bond bill of a project seemingly unrelated to the state's water problems.

"Frankly, if I have the opportunity to use the power I have to further civil rights and to further California history in any way, I'm going to do that," he said late Tuesday afternoon.

Dennis Mangers, a senior adviser to Steinberg and chairman of the Capital Unity Council, which is overseeing the project, said the proposed center's connection to water was that the center would include an aquarium, a botanical garden and other exhibits dealing with the vital role that water issues have played in the history of California.

The "water education component" would educate visitors about the role water systems play in encouraging successful communities and in triggering conflict.

Mangers said the council, which was created in 1999 in the wake of a series of hate crimes in Northern California, was about halfway to its fundraising goal of $30 million to build the center.

Mangers said the water education element was included as part of the center's plans long before the bond measure was drafted.

Steinberg's $10 million earmark for a project he personally has led sparked controversy shortly after midnight when a story by The Bee was published on its Web site and word began circulating among lawmakers of both houses.



A few rules are needed to help foster a feeling of community. We encourage a free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect, but any post that violates someone's right to use and enjoy fresnobee.com is prohibited. Before you post, please read the terms of use and obey these simple guidelines.

Here are the ground rules:

  1. Be yourself. A nickname will be used for posts, but if an editor finds a user without a verifiable name, that user will be warned or banned.
  2. Keep it clean. Foul language (defined by prime-time standards) will not be tolerated. Neither will the intentional misspelling of foul language or the use of non-English curse words.
  3. Be truthful. Do not lie or link to sites that may be considered libelous, defamatory or false.
  4. Be nice. Don't harass anyone. Don't threaten anyone. Don't use racial slurs. Don't post anything sexually explicit.
  5. Be an individual. Do not advertise or solicit. Do not harvest any information for business use.
  6. Be original. Do not post copyrighted material.
  7. Follow the law. Don't do anything or post anything considered illegal by city, county, state or federal regulations and laws.

more videos »